MAR NASDAQ Privacy breach

Marriott International

Marriott disclosed long-running unauthorized access to the legacy Starwood reservation database, affecting hundreds of millions of guest records.

1 month vs SPY -2.9 pp Below SPY

-12.0% MAR vs -9.0% SPY

DisclosureNov 30, 2018 · time unknown
Company’s roleAffected parent company
Available data12 months complete
Share typeCommon stock · MAR

This site shows how share prices moved after an incident became public. It does not prove that the incident caused the move. Company news, sector moves and the wider market can affect every result. Educational only — not investment advice.

Disclosure timing

When could the market react?

The baseline is the last adjusted close before the news was public. The reaction session is the first close afterward.

  1. 01Baseline sessionNov 29, 2018

    Normalized to 100 for both MAR and SPY.

  2. 02Public disclosureNov 30, 2018 · time unknown

    Publication time is not documented; lower timing precision.

  3. 03First reaction closeNov 30, 2018

    -5.6% company total return versus +0.6% for SPY; -6.2 pp market-relative return.

Disclosure time is unknown; the previous session close is used as baseline.

Time windows

Company vs SPY

Each row uses the last trading session on or before its target date. “Market-relative” is the company return minus the SPY return, in percentage points.

Returns measured from the shared baseline session
WindowEndpointMARSPYMarket-relativeSignal
First reaction Nov 30, 2018 -5.6% +0.6% -6.2 pp Below SPY
+7 days Dec 7, 2018 -8.7% -3.8% -4.9 pp Below SPY
+1 month Dec 28, 2018 -12.0% -9.0% -2.9 pp Below SPY
+3 months Feb 28, 2019 +3.1% +2.3% +0.8 pp Above SPY
+6 months May 30, 2019 +3.0% +2.9% +0.1 pp Above SPY
+12 months Nov 29, 2019 +16.9% +17.0% -0.1 pp Below SPY
Compare with current catalog aggregates
WindowThis caseCatalog medianCatalog meann
First reaction-6.2 pp-0.8 pp-1.5 pp30
+7 days-4.9 pp-2.0 pp-4.0 pp30
+1 month-2.9 pp-6.6 pp-6.8 pp30
+3 months+0.8 pp-5.1 pp-6.6 pp30
+6 months+0.1 pp-5.6 pp-7.5 pp30
+12 months-0.1 pp-3.7 pp-10.1 pp30

Normalized total return

MAR compared with SPY

Baseline session = 100. Adjusted close reflects splits and reinvested distributions.

Marriott International had +16.9% company total return versus +17.0% for SPY; -0.1 pp market-relative return. The chart shows normalized adjusted-close performance for up to 24 months.

View tabular chart fallback
Representative normalized chart points, sampled approximately monthly
DateMARSPY
Nov 29, 2018100.0100.0
Jan 2, 201988.291.8
Feb 1, 201994.099.1
Mar 5, 2019103.1102.4
Apr 3, 2019108.4105.6
May 3, 2019115.4108.4
Jun 4, 2019105.9103.4
Jul 3, 2019117.2110.7
Aug 2, 2019112.4108.4
Sep 3, 2019103.1107.7
Oct 2, 201999.8107.2
Oct 31, 2019105.0112.9
Dec 2, 2019116.9116.0
Jan 2, 2020126.1121.5
Feb 3, 2020117.8121.2
Mar 4, 202098.9117.0
Apr 2, 202052.794.8
May 4, 202069.0106.7
Jun 3, 202083.5117.5
Jul 2, 202073.4118.0
Aug 3, 202069.8124.3
Sep 1, 202086.2133.3
Oct 1, 202078.9127.9
Oct 30, 202077.6123.9
Nov 30, 2020106.0137.4

Price recovery

Recovered

Here, recovery only means that adjusted close reached the baseline again. It does not mean every effect of the incident ended.

State
Recovered
Initial trough
-8.7% on Dec 7, 2018
Recovery close
Feb 19, 2019
Calendar days
81
Observation cap
24 months after disclosure

Hypothetical $1,000

What would $1,000 have looked like?

Compare $1,000 in MAR with $1,000 in SPY, bought and measured on the same dates.

MAR value $1,048 Marriott International
SPY value $993 US market benchmark
Difference vs SPY $55 Observed result

Entry Dec 3, 2018 Exit Jun 3, 2019

Uses fractional shares and adjusted close. Leaves out taxes, fees and slippage. The holding period starts on the purchase date. This is a historical illustration, not an investment strategy.

Case note

Marriott announced that an unauthorized party had accessed and copied information from the legacy Starwood reservation environment. The affected data included guest identity, contact, travel and, in some cases, passport and payment-card information.

The case is assigned to the listed parent because Marriott owned and operated the affected business at disclosure. The source gives a date but no retained publication time, so November 29 is the baseline session.

Evidence

Sources and case review

We qualify each case before checking its price results. These links support the disclosure date, listing, incident and business impact.

  1. primary Nov 30, 2018
    Marriott announces Starwood guest reservation database security incident Marriott International / U.S. SEC Supports: Disclosure, Impact, Description
  2. primary Nov 30, 2018
    Marriott November 30, 2018 Form 8-K Marriott International / U.S. SEC Supports: Listing, Impact
  3. Listing evidenceChecked Jul 20, 2026
    Marriott November 30, 2018 Form 8-K U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission The event-period filing identifies Marriott as the Nasdaq-listed parent issuing the disclosure.

Why it is included. Marriott directly controlled the affected Starwood systems, publicly documented the disclosure date and reported a global guest-record exposure large enough to trigger extensive regulatory action. Reviewed Jul 20, 2026.